Gun bill provision restoring local control may be in jeopardy

green
Chanilim714 [CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons

With the legislative session in its final weeks, some advocates fear legislators are about to kill a substantial part of a gun law reform bill.

Assembly Bill 291, which was heard in a joint Senate and Assembly Judiciary Committee April 1, hasn’t seen any official movement since it passed the Assembly floor in a mostly party-line vote April 23 and was referred back to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“We’ve had a number of stakeholders reach out over the past few days to express some concerns about this bill,” said Cheryl Bruce, executive director for the Nevada Senate Democrats, via email. “Before we proceed with moving the bill forward, we want to make sure we are having conversations with anyone who has an interest in it.”

Bruce did not identify the “stakeholders,” and did not respond to a follow-up email.

While the legislation would ban bump stocks and other gun modifications, and lower the amount of alcohol that can be present in the blood of a person in possession of a firearm, it would also undo 2015 legislation that preempted local municipalities from passing ordinances in response to gun violence.

Multiple sources told Nevada Current they fear that when the bill gets another hearing, the provisions restoring local government authority will be amended out.

“We are hearing rumors that this bill is under attack and we are concerned (the preemption provision) will be removed,” said Christian Heyne, the Vice President of Policy with the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “That is a cornerstone part of the bill.”

The Current also reached out to Everytown for Gun Safety, a national gun control group that employs nine paid lobbyists in Carson City. The group declined to comment.

Attempts to obtain comment from bill sponsor Assemblywoman Sandra Jauregui were unsuccessful.

After the mass shooting during the Route 91 Harvest music festival Oct. 1, 2017, several Democratic lawmakers were outraged to discover local officials were powerless to enact provisions at the municipal level.

That included then-candidate Steve Sisolak who was considering enacting county ordinances to ban bump stocks and take other responses to the shooting. During his gubernatorial race, Sisolak often mentioned “1 October,” and campaigned heavily on gun violence prevention.

In a 2018 Las Vegas Review-Journal article, Sisolak said the Legislature had tied the counties hands in what they could do. “This is one example where we need more flexibility and control handed over to the local governments,” he said in the article.

However, when asked by the Current if the governor would sign legislation that continued to preempt local governments from taking action to stop gun violence, his office did not respond directly, instead saying, “the governor looks forward to monitoring AB291, as it moves through the legislative process.”

Elizabeth Becker, a local spokeswoman with gun violence prevention organization Moms Demand Action, said their group wants to see all the components of AB291 enacted.

“Our County Commission needs the authority to regulate and pass gun legislation at a county level,” she said. “It is needed to keep the Strip safe.”

While she is glad lawmakers passed, and Sisolak signed, legislation at the beginning of the session to close a loophole that allowed gun buyers to avoid background checks by going through unlicensed gun sellers  — the legislation was a response to a 2016 ballot initiative that passed but was never enforced — she stressed that preemption laws still need to be reconsidered to continue lawmaker’s commitment to gun safety.

Jauregui, who survived the shooting, sponsored the legislation and lead the charge to restore power to local governments. 

“This isn’t an anti-gun bill,” she said during AB291’s first hearing. “I’m not an anti-gun legislator, and this isn’t a partisan issue. I’m married to a Republican and we own guns and we believe that better gun laws make us better gun owners.”

Opponents of the bill said allowing local governments power over gun regulations infringed on their Second Amendment rights, and argued repealing the preemption provisions was a step backward. 

After the contentious hearing, Jauregui added an amendment to the bill that would allow the state to maintain authority over local governments, but also gave county commissioners the power to enact ordinances if they are more stringent than state law.

State preemption laws aren’t new or even confined to Nevada. Heyne said those laws, usually crafted in secret, have been proposed or enacted in multiple states.

“But Nevada has a unique opportunity to do something about it,” he said.

Michael Lyle
Michael Lyle (MJ to some) has been a journalist in Las Vegas for eight years.  He started his career at View Neighborhood News, the community edition of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. During his seven years with the R-J, he won several first place awards from the Nevada Press Association and was named its 2011 Journalist of Merit. He left the paper in 2017 and spent a year as a freelance journalist accumulating bylines anywhere from The Washington Post to Desert Companion. While he covers a range of topics from homelessness to the criminal justice system, he gravitates toward stories about race relations and LGBTQ issues. Born and mostly raised in Las Vegas, Lyle graduated from UNLV with a degree in Journalism and Media Studies. He is currently working on his master's in Communications through an online program at Syracuse University. In his spare time, Lyle cooks through Ina Garten recipes in hopes of one day becoming the successor to the Barefoot Contessa throne. When he isn’t cooking (or eating), he also enjoys reading, running and re-watching episodes of “Parks and Recreation.” He is also in the process of learning kickboxing.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Proponents of this bill support a patchwork of gun laws in different jurisdictions. The NV legislature addressed this many year’s ago and fixed this mess before it was to be litigated at a Federal level. Passing AB291 now guarantees a “Heller” type Supreme Court challenge to this unconstitutional change. It is wrong and it will not reduce violence.

    We hope reasonable NV legislators will see through the lobbyist hype and vote accordingly, using a caution and logic as their guide.

  2. Thats great news, anyone that attaches their name to this travesty needs to be tried for treason and punished accordingly.

  3. This will pass and be signed into law. The dems know they are on borrowed time due to this and other antics and wish to destroy as much of NV before they end up jobless again.

  4. The bill isn’t dead yet. It was granted a waiver in the legislature to still be acted upon. It is now more important than ever to contact your legislators to make sure it DOES NOT PASS. Even if the anti-preemption portions are removed, this bill is still incredibly dangerous and must be defeated. 113 must pass, 291 must die.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here