Wynn Resorts’ $2.6 billion Encore Boston Harbor opened Sunday (Photo: Encore Boston Harbor Twitter)
If Nevada doubled the gambling, er, gaming tax, the rate would still be about half what casino corporations pay in Massachusetts.
Wynn Resorts opened a $2.6 billion casino resort in Boston Sunday. MGM opened a billion-dollar property in western Massachusetts last year.
Nevada taxes gambling at 6.75 percent of gross revenue.
In Massachusetts, it’s 25 percent.
Home of the nation’s largest gambling industry and headquarters for the world’s largest gambling corporations, Nevada also sports the nation’s lowest tax rate on casino revenue.
Economically, politically and culturally the state’s dominant industry, resort corporations are treated with kid gloves in Nevada. As a result, Nevada must rely on other sources of revenue to pay for schools and all the other public goods, services and obligations that were underfunded yet again by the Legislature this year.
The sales tax is also the only tax Gov. Steve Sisolak and the temp workers who fill Nevada’s legislative seats approved hiking this year. Or to be precise, they gave counties the authority to raise the sales tax.
Oh well. The Legislature is over, because Nevada likes to think it’s a big grown-up place in some ways — did you know Las Vegas is getting a football team? — while pretending it’s a sleepy little backwater in others, such as relegating state lawmakers to a structurally cheesy and geographically inane 120-day session every other year.
So there’s nothing that can be done about anything until the next time duly elected temps go to Carson City, in 2021.
The aforementioned tentative county sales tax increase is anything but a slam dunk. And it’s just one piece of the contraption Sisolak and legislative Democrats cobbled together to try to keep some modest promises to educators.
Another key component, which the governor and legislators did approve and is now law, kept a payroll tax in place that was scheduled to expire. “Unconstitutional,” screamed Republicans & Friends, who argue that continuing a tax that was scheduled to expire is tantamount to increasing taxes. Taxes can’t be increased without a two-thirds approval of both houses of the Legislature, because Nevada voters approved a constitutional amendment that said so toward the end of the last century.
Republicans have been under pressure from their brain trust, i.e, the Review-Journal opinion page, to sue the Democrats over the tax. (Presumably that means the brain trust’s funder, Sheldon Adelson, would be down with footing the attorneys’ fees?).
Republican skittishness about suing would be understandable. If they sue and lose, Republicans could set a policy precedent they don’t want to set.
But neither prudence, caution nor thoughtfulness being part of the Republican Party brand in Nevada or anywhere else these days, they may well do what Adelson’s paper says, and sue.
And they might win.
In other words, the budget that the governor and lawmakers passed in 2019 could unravel well before the Legislature is scheduled to meet again in 2021
Like most states, Nevada gives it’s governor way too much authority (with the 4th of July coming up it should be noted that of the many causes that created the American Revolutionary moment, yearning for strong executive authority at the expense of legislative power was not one of them). If county resistance and/or a court ruling blows a hole in a budget that’s already been approved, a constitutionally powerful governor’s office might find ways to muddle through until legislative temps are back on the state payroll two years from now.
But why bother?
Nevada’s lawmakers were called into a special session in 2014 to give Tesla $1.3 billion in tax breaks, subsidies in the form of salable tax credits, and other goodies. Two years later, the temps were called back to Carson City for another special session to rubber stamp a $750 million public subsidy, financed by increasing room taxes, to build a football field for a professional sports monopoly.
Why not call a special session to finally fund education?
Everyone knows where to start. The state’s Lilliputian gambling tax rate insults and humiliates the people of Nevada each and every day. The industry is committed to expanding not only around the world but into more U.S. cities, where the industry will pay gambling tax rates four or five or more times higher than Nevada’s rate. Digging in to protect their Nevada sweetheart deal while low-income taxpayers pick up the slack and Nevada public responsibilities languish and suffer, Nevada’s beloved gambling industry plays Nevada residents for chumps.
Maybe county commissioners will do as Sisolak and Democratic legislators say, and make poor people pay even more of their income in sales taxes. And maybe cooler Republican heads (there are some, presumably) will prevail and there won’t be a suit over retaining current payroll tax rates.
And maybe everyone who isn’t Sisolak or Democratic legislators can just keep doing what they’ve been doing since the legislative session ended: being disgusted at how the state failed education yet again, and hoping beyond hope for better results two years from now.
But sooner or later, something’s got to give. And that something is the resort industry.
Oh by the way, the other big education thing out of the session was a revised funding formula that rural Nevadans are not happy about at all.
One wonders if Republicans who represent those rural Nevadans in the Legislature might be getting in the mood to tax Las Vegas casinos.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.