Nevada Supreme Court hears arguments over fairness of cash bail

nevada supreme court bldg
Wikimedia CC BY-SA 3.0 by Coolcaesar

The fairness of the cash bail system in Clark County was scrutinized in arguments before the Nevada Supreme Court Wednesday. 

Reviewing the cases of defendants from Southern Nevada, the Clark County Public Defender’s Office and the Clark County District Attorney’s Office sparred over whether or not bail has been properly administered.

Jose Valdez-Jimenez, one of the defendants, was accused of stealing thousands of dollars worth of merchandise and was assigned a $40,000 bail he couldn’t afford — he later took a plea deal and is currently serving his sentence.

“What we’re saying today is when prosecutors go to court, as they do every day in Clark County, and only ask for a money bail amount without specifically saying if they are truly seeking detention or some kind of conditioned release, and when a judge does not make a finding whether detention is actually necessary and instead fixes a money bail amount that may or may not be beyond the reach of a defendant, that money bail is unlawful when it results in the detention of individuals too poor to secure their freedom,” Nancy Lemke with the Clark County public defender’s office. “This is what happens in Clark County every day.”

If a wealthy person with the same charges was able to afford the bail, Lemke argued, they would be released.

Steven Owens, speaking for the District Attorney’s office, disagreed.

“I think that’s a fallacy to assume the bail would be set the same,” he said.

Financial constraints of defendants, he added, are taken into consideration. “The judge looked at the financial ability but also looked at if he is a danger to the community, or his history of failing to appear.”

In the end, he said community safety takes precedence.

Owens also said that under the Constitution, excessive bail amounts don’t necessarily mean amounts people can’t afford. 

In addition to her concerns about how bail amounts are set, Lemke said prosecutors should be required to explain their intent — for instance, if they are seeking a high bail because they don’t want a person to be released from jail. 

“You have a prosecutor not walking into the court and asking for detention, but asking for a money bail amount,” Lemke said. “With the defendant and the defense not there, we don’t know if that money bail amount is going to operate as a detention order or a release condition.”

“We’re not saying you can’t use money bail,” Lemke said. However, if the prosecutor is going to use bail as a way to keep a person detained, she added, it should be the prosecutor who is burdened to say so. 

Valdez-Jimenez’s case isn’t the only example brought up to highlight disparities in the bail system, which is why groups like Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada and the ACLU of Nevada have been trying to overhaul the state’s bail system. PLAN Action campaigned to unseat current Clark County District Attorney Steve Wolfson while both groups lobbied for bail reforms at the Legislature. 

While lawmakers didn’t pass any bail reforms — only a study bill — national groups like Civil Rights Corp, which is assisting the public defenders’ office in the Supreme Court Case, think a court decision could drastically alter Nevada’s bail system. 

The court didn’t give any indication when it would rule.

Michael Lyle
Michael Lyle (MJ to some) has been a journalist in Las Vegas for eight years.  He started his career at View Neighborhood News, the community edition of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. During his seven years with the R-J, he won several first place awards from the Nevada Press Association and was named its 2011 Journalist of Merit. He left the paper in 2017 and spent a year as a freelance journalist accumulating bylines anywhere from The Washington Post to Desert Companion. While he covers a range of topics from homelessness to the criminal justice system, he gravitates toward stories about race relations and LGBTQ issues. Born and mostly raised in Las Vegas, Lyle graduated from UNLV with a degree in Journalism and Media Studies. He is currently working on his master's in Communications through an online program at Syracuse University. In his spare time, Lyle cooks through Ina Garten recipes in hopes of one day becoming the successor to the Barefoot Contessa throne. When he isn’t cooking (or eating), he also enjoys reading, running and re-watching episodes of “Parks and Recreation.” He is also in the process of learning kickboxing.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Ankle monitors are $12 a day, drug patch $5 plus $20 to test a week, so $500 a month for this type of release. Not much for wealthy person, but a lot for minimum wage person. Wealthy not only get better attorneys and court experts, expert witnesses, investigators, etc. they can hold out financially for a better plea deal. So system has problems regardless. Findland bases traffic fines on income I believe, that may be option,

  2. Why is the PD’s office presenting this issue now? Is it because Piro didn’t get his wacky Bills passed? Did Hardesty put them up to this? Why did Hardesty bring up a law from 1927? Nevada is a different state now and crime has become more violent. Does anyone care about the danger to our community? Someone please stop turning Nevada into California.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here