Las Vegas City Councilwoman Michele Fiore (Facebook profile photo).
While discussing a potential change to the city’s domestic violence law that would allow those convicted to keep their firearms, Las Vegas City Councilwoman Michele Fiore berated domestic violence and gun reform groups pushing back against the proposal.
“I’m a stickler for facts,” she said dismissing data presented by some of the groups.
That remark from Fiore — who in 2015 said during a radio program she believed cancer is “a fungus” that can be cured by “flushing with, say, salt water, sodium carbonate, through that line and flushing out the fungus” — prompted mockery on Twitter Monday.
The woman who thinks cancer is caused by a fungal infection, and can be cured by baking soda — oh yes, she's a stickler for the facts. https://t.co/KPxq70gRs8
— Scott Swank (@EugeneVClemens) October 14, 2019
Wanna hear a good joke?
Councilwoman @votefiore just said she’s a stickler for “facts”
— Battle Born Progress (@BattleBornProg) October 14, 2019
“When we are talking about a city ordinance that applies to the city, and you guys come up here and give me national numbers, that does not work for me,” Fiore said. “When you come up here and represent Everytown (for Gun Safety), that does not work for me because the numbers are skewed. It’s national and does not belong in the city of Las Vegas.”
During its Monday recommending committee meeting, which determines what ordinances continue on to the full council agenda, the city voted to advance the proposal.
The ordinance is scheduled to be voted on by the council Wednesday, a day before the same groups opposing the proposal are hosting a candlelight vigil at City Hall to recognize domestic violence victims in honor of Domestic Violence Awareness Month.
Those opposed note that Nevada has consistently ranked poorly when it comes to domestic violence.
The Violence Policy Center released its annual “When Men Murder Women” report in September that showed Nevada ranked fourth highest in the nation in men who murder women as a result of intimate partner violence. In the cases where a weapon was identified, guns were used for more than half.
“We have lagged behind other states for decades in the way we are dealing with domestic violence,” said Liz Ortenburger, the CEO of SafeNest. “Simply removing one portion (of the domestic violence law) to make it work logistically for the city is not the right move for victims.”
She also said that the city “carries 55 percent of all misdemeanor cases for domestic violence for the state” or on average 4,500 per year.
In 2015, the Nevada Legislature enacted legislation that prevents those charged with domestic violence from possessing a firearm. The Nevada Supreme Court ruled in September that defendants in those cases are constitutionally entitled to a trial by jury.
The city argued it doesn’t have the infrastructure — no ability to summon a jury pool or even jury boxes in its courtrooms — to comply with that ruling, which is why it is trying to rewrite existing law.
Now that the supreme court ruling is in effect, the city attorney’s office noted that the criminal division is charging people with simple battery opposed to misdemeanor domestic violence in order to not trigger the need for a jury trial.
“This ordinance would at least allow us to elevate it back up to battery domestic violence with the provisions in the state, obviously without the firearm,” Councilman Stavros Anthony said.
Ortenburger along with organizers from Moms Demand Action argued removing the provision that takes away firearms, would increase the chance of a homicide.
She added the new ordinance would increase homicide rates for both victims and police officers under the new provision. “In 2017, more officers were killed on domestic violence calls in our country than any other type of call,” she added
William Horne, a lobbyist for Safe Nest, said the city is leaving itself open to be challenged legally. “Legally, it’s a circumvention of state statute,” he said. “The state found it important to put this provision in statute in 2015 for the protection of victims. Simply removing it from the ordinance is an illegal circumvention of state statute.”
The city attorney’s office believes they would be able to defend the ordinance in the face of any legal challenges.
Instead of rewriting the city’s domestic violence laws, Horne urged state lawmakers to call a special session to make necessary fixes.
Henderson and North Las Vegas are also proposing similar workarounds to the supreme court ruling.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.