Train to Victorville will eat into affordable housing financing

choo choo
Slide from Virgin Trains presentation to the Clark County Commission.

The proposed financing for a plan to reduce traffic between Las Vegas and California and stimulate the economy by shuttling tourists via high-speed rail has no public funding, but would slash bonding capacity for a favored source of financing for low-income and affordable housing. 

Virgin Trains USA, which is backed by Fortress Investment Group, intends to sell tax-exempt private activity bonds to finance much of the $4 billion project. 

But the move would reduce financing options for developers of multi-family and senior housing projects for the next two years.

The federal government allows states to designate tax-exempt bonding authority to projects with a public purpose.  Nevada’s annual allocation of private activity bonds (PABs) is capped at roughly $300 million a year.

Last year, $200 million of the bonding authority was used to finance a variety of residential projects. The tax exempt feature of the bonds reduces the cost of financing for affordable and low-income housing projects. PABs are also what trigger eligibility for the 4 percent federal low income housing tax credit (LIHTC), rendering projects even more attractive to developers and investors.

The tax credits generated by the tax exempt bonds are “the most important resource for creating affordable housing in the United States today,” according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Nevada is experiencing a low-income housing crisis.  The centerpiece of Gov. Steve Sisolak and Democratic lawmakers’ housing policy this legislative session was to allocate $10 million a year from a separate, state source — transferable tax credits — not to exceed $40 million over four years.   

The train project is seeking $100 million of Nevada’s PAB capacity this year and another $100 million next year. California has already approved bonding authority for $300 million in PABs for the train this year and is expected to approve the same amount next year.

Thanks to Congress, Virgin Travel can parlay the $800 million in bonding authority it seeks from California and Nevada into $3.2 billion in bond sales. 

“Federal law allows a private developer of a high-speed rail system to issue tax-exempt bonds in an amount equal to four times the allocation provided to the project from a state, significant leverage that is not available to other privately-owned projects,” said Teri Williams, spokesperson for the Nevada Department of Business and Industry. 

A public hearing on Virgin’s request is scheduled for Thursday morning. 

What does Sisolak think of allocating a third of the state’s $300 million private activity bond capacity to a private train for the next two years? 

“This is currently under review by state agencies,” spokesman Ryan McInerny told the Current via email. “The Governor looks forward to being briefed by them upon the completion of their review.”

Virgin Travel is the latest iteration of the venture known first as Desert Xpress and later as Brightline. Billionaire Richard Branson bought a minority share of the company and gave it the Virgin moniker.  The company’s Miami to West Palm Beach route began operations in January 2018 and is serving fewer than a million riders a year, less than half of Virgin’s projected ridership of 2 million. 

We’ve always projected a steady ramp up over three to four years,” said Ben Porritt, Senior Vice President of Corporate Affairs for Virgin Trains USA.

Planned expansions have been delayed, as was an initial public offering scheduled for last February, according to Bloomberg. The company sought as much as $538 million in that IPO, which would have valued the company at about $3.15 billion.

Ridership projections inherited from DesertXpress estimate the route between Victorville and Las Vegas will have 3 million round-trips in its first year of operation. A new ridership study is underway, according to Porritt. 

The Clark County Commission instructed staff this week to draft a resolution supporting the project for its November 5th meeting.

“I expect it to pass,” Commissioner Michael Naft said in an interview, although he admits he has not seen ridership projections. “Without seeing the numbers, I’m supportive of the concept of high speed rail. We’ve been talking about it my entire life. We finally have a partner in Virgin that isn’t seeking public money. They’ve done well in Florida. It’s a good solution.”

Whether it’s a good solution, as Naft says, remains to be seen. The plan would require visitors to make their way to Victorville and pay $60 for a one-way ticket to Las Vegas for a roughly one hour and fifteen-minute trip — less than half the three hours by car.  Expansions are planned to Palmdale and eventually Los Angeles. 

“If I get involved in a project like that, having seen what went on in Florida, I would have to be somewhat suspect of the perfect ending and perfect outcome,” Jim Colby, senior municipal strategist at Van Eck Associates Corp., a company that holds some of the Florida securities, told Bloomberg last month. 

Financial analyst Guy Hobbs of Hobbs Ong and Associates is preparing findings on the project for Clark County that would allow the bonds to go to market. 

“It’s one thing to get the bond allocation by the state.  It’s another to actually sell the bonds,” says Hobbs, who has been commissioned by the state to produce, among other things, findings of financial feasibility on a tight timeline. 

“Meeting that timeline and doing the due diligence to make the findings isn’t going to happen overnight.”

Hobbs says key findings, including a ridership study, have not been provided by the state. 

“Ridership studies are an engineer’s professional opinion of what ridership can be.  We can’t attest to financial feasibility without a ridership study,” Hobbs added.

Dana Gentry
Reporter | Dana Gentry is a native Las Vegan and award-winning investigative journalist. She is a graduate of Bishop Gorman High School and holds a Bachelor's degree in Communications from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Gentry began her career in broadcasting as an intern at Channel 8, KLAS-TV. She later became a reporter at Channel 8, working with Las Vegas TV news legends Bob Stoldal and the late Ned Day. Gentry left her reporting job in 1985 to focus on motherhood. She returned to TV news in 2001 to launch "Face to Face with Jon Ralston" and the weekly business programs In Business Las Vegas and Vegas Inc, which she co-anchored with Jeff Gillan. Dana is the mother of four adult children, three cats, three dogs and a cockatoo.

4 COMMENTS

  1. Raiders team appreciated after stadium deal Just like Texas Rangers etc . Build a venue the team goes up in value. Nevada could have bought any pro football team and built a stadium with junk bonds. Flipped the team – then paid for stadium with profits paying off bonds. Raiders owner made a billion.

    Just like the train. Profits go to big developers not the unwashed masses. Victorville will be connected to metro link Acton Palmdale area 50 miles of fly ground. Link to San Bernardino same distance- but el Cayon Pass makes that more expensive

  2. The article states, “Nevada’s annual allocation of private activity bonds (PABs) is capped at roughly $300 million a year. Last year, $200 million of the bonding authority was used to finance a variety of residential projects.” Which means there was $100 million in unused allocation. So how is the train eating into affordable housing financing? How much allocation goes unused each year?

    • Hi Bob, The article states there was $200 million to residential projects. The same year $44 million was authorized for a garbage-to-fuel reprocessing center in Northern Nevada. Bonding capacity can be allocated to a variety of other endeavors. Thanks for your interest.

  3. I think working out a compromise and balance on the funding allocation for this train is imparative to the well-being of Southern Nevada. We do have an affordable-housing shortage, most States do also have this problem because of lack of fore-sight. It seems like allocating funding of some kind to the housing situation, even though it is a smaller amount than projected overall needs would be a step in the right direction. Then allocation to to train, also on a lower level than projected needs. I believe doing this would force private funding to come forward for the train.
    Now that we have a football team and stadium to deal with, something needs to be done to mitigate the horrible traffic situation game-days are going to inflict upon our infrastructure. Shouldn’t the team owners and other profiteers offer some private funding to this project?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here